Is that why my English husband received loads of abuse during the Indy Ref and after when we stayed up there? (Disclaimer :he voted Yes as well ya clowns ! Have yer Indy and enjoy it as you never call out the thugs and bigots on yer side! You show the nation up!)
See, this is exactly what I'm talking about.
The fact your husband was abused is indicative of the fact that there are ignorant, xenophobic, and racist arseholes everywhere. Scotland is no different, and no serious person would ever try to credibly claim there is no such thing as anti-english abuse perpetrated by Scots.
What is ridiculous is the assertion that this is a phenomenon that only occurs because of the SNP, or the fact that some Scots desire Independence, or that it is what drives a wish for constitutional change, or that every single indi supporter is motivated by anti-English hate and indulges in it.
I've been abused for being a Scot countless times by English people. It doesn't particularly bother me because I'm rational enough to understand that there are idiots, bigots, and morons in every part of the world. What I don't immediately conclude, is that the people I was abused by MUST be unionists, or Tories, or that the abuse I received must stem from some sort of affiliation with or belief in a political movement. Some people are just arseholes, it really isn't any more complicated than that.
It's completely untrue that pro-Indi people 'never call out the thugs and bigots on 'your' side', but the statement itself is duplicitous because it implies that reasonable and decent pro-Indi people actually view the racists as being on their 'side'. We don't. I've called out the morons in Siol Nan Gaedheal umpteen times and I'm happy to do that every single time they rear their heads as their an embarrassment to anyone Scots, not just pro-indi people. The assertion that they are in any way representative of pro-indi people as a group is grossly offensive, because the counterpart to that would be asserting that Tommy Robinson, the EDL, Britain First, and so on, are representative of the views of all pro-union English people, and therefore their words and actions can be taken as representative of unionists in general, and therefore any unionist should be expected to apologise and answer for them.
Plainly ludicrous, but that's exactly what happens to perfectly decent Scots who support Indi. Why are we repeatedly associated with, and expected to answer for a group of fringe lunatics that are in no way associated with us and do not represent us?