@Staffy1
Well I’m not seeing much compassion to disabled here, so piss off with your “you might want to try it”. You do realise that there is sometimes nothing that can be done about a disabled person indecently exposing themself unless you can move like lightning and are ready for it at all times, not looking away for a split second. It’s not something that’s desirable, but it’s something that might happen through no fault of ill intention of anyone.
Are you not reading my posts?
Not once have I said you can do anything about a disabled person exposing themselves, in fact I shared that one of my loved ones is doing similar due to his dementia.
What I have said is that I DO expect carers not to say women and girls someone disabled has indecently exposed themselves to "how was he a threat? He couldn't have done anything."
I don't personally know any parents or other carers of disabled people who would show such a lack of compassion as to say to a woman sharing a story of being a victim of indecent exposure at 12 years old "how was he a threat? He couldn't have done anything."
The action of indecent exposure due to a disability = nobody's fault at all.
The reaction of a carer to the victim of that indecent exposure = their responsibility.
And they have a moral responsibility not to tell girls and women that they are wrong to be upset about any man indecently exposing himself to them, whether he is disabled or not.
My value judgment is concerned only with your judgment of that posters reaction to someone indecently exposing himself to her.
Literally nobody has said the things you've implied they have eg that disabled people shouldn't leave the house! Many of us have disabled loved ones and some of us are disabled ourselves.
So don't tell me to piss off, because the only thing I've done is challenge your behaviour when it comes to judging a woman for the reaction of her twelve year old self.