@Trying20
I know not everyone has to fight every cause, but sometimes, and as I identified earlier in this thread - it's like they can't win. If there's no third space where do they go?
Do you know how hard women had to fight for single sex public toilets? See below. Men crashed into model toilets on purpose in protest at the idea.
So women fought long and hard against a system that was against them, who wanted them at home and not in public where they had access to facilities.
Why did women have to fight so hard against what men want, but you think trans women for example shouldn't campaign for third spaces?
Why should male bodied people stand on the backs of women to many women's detriment, making many women uncomfortable and frightened in the process and also means Muslim women for example cannot use public single sex facilities anymore?
If a necessary service isn't available to a group of people and there isn't a compromise that doesn't negatively affect other people, that group of people need to campaign for change.
Info on the fight women faced:
In Victorian Britain, most public toilets were designed for men. Of course, this affected women’s ability to leave the home, as women who wished to travel had to plan their route to include areas where they could relieve themselves. Thus, women never travelled much further than where family and friends resided. This is often called the ‘urinary leash’, as women could only go so far as their bladders would allow them.
This lack of access to toilets impeded women’s access to public spaces as there were no women’s toilets in the work place or anywhere else in public. This led to the formation of the Ladies Sanitary Association, organised shortly after the creation of the first public flushing toilet. The Association campaigned from the 1850s onwards, through lectures and the distribution of pamphlets on the subject. They succeeded somewhat, as a few women’s toilets opened in Britain.
Then a second group emerged called the Union of Women’s Liberal and Radical Associations, which campaigned for working class women to have public toilets in Camden. In 1898 the members wrote to The Vestry in Camden for toilet access for women in the already existing men’s toilets. However, the plans for a women’s toilet were set back by several years as men opposed the women’s toilets being situated next to the men’s.
In some cases, plans for women’s toilets were deliberately sabotaged. When a model of a women’s toilet was set up on the pavement in Camden High Street, hansom cabs (driven by men) deliberately drove into the model toilet to demonstrate that it was situated in a most inconvenient position!