@TheUsualShitshow
"As for the car driving, I don't think anyone at work should be forced to share a car, driver or passenger, with someone with Autism.
As for the car driving, I don't think anyone at work should be forced to share a car, driver or passenger, with someone with Cerebral Palsy.
As for the car driving, I don't think anyone at work should be forced to share a car, driver or passenger, with someone with Parkinson's.
All of these diseases feature random sounds and/or movements.
Still good with what you wrote?"
I think you are right. Where an aspect of someone's illness or disability puts others in the car at risk, then I think that if they travel for their employment, then special measures need to be put in place for everyone's safety. In my NHS job, I used to carry patients on home visits in my own car and if ever i felt that it was not safe to do so then I could require ambulance transport. People with a certain level of involuntary movement or other behaviour might be accommodated in the back seat with an escort but not always. This wasn't to degrade or shut away those people but to keep everyone safe.
Additionally if the car is the employees own, even if they are using it for work, (as I was) then the final decision on who the car owner/driver will carry rests with the owner. Unless the OP's T's abd C's are very strange indeed, I can't imagine that they require the OP to carry passengers against her will.