@AsYouWishButtercup
I'm not comparing anything with anything. Got it?
But you are. That’s literally what you’re doing. If you weren’t comparing you’d be asking if people are outraged when short men go walking through dodgy woods at 2am for absolutely no purpose. But you’re choosing to compare women to inanimiate objects.
I really don’t know how I can explain it any clearer
I am literally not. OMG I can't believe some people are just so thick.
It's a simple question: Is it offensive to suggest one modifies their behaviour due to the existence of criminals?
In the case of keeping valuables out of sight, I think society has accepted it is not offensive. So why does it become offensive when the same suggestion is made in regards to personal safety?
In fact it's not even offensive when made in regards to general personal safety, only when it's directed at women. Nobody is getting offended by being told some neighbourhoods or estates are best avoided at night. But when it's suggested that women take sensible precautions, somehow this becomes offensive. Why?
After all, any objection to that final example would also apply to the previous ones, so what makes this suggestion so uniquely offensive?
Same goes in regards to victim blaming. Most people, upon hearing that someone left an iphone on a car seat and it was stolen, would think, 'Well why did they leave it there?'. And that isn't considered victim blaming.
I'd go so far to say that most people would question why an ordinary bloke wandered into a dangerous estate at night, and we still don't consider that victim blaming.
Yet ask that same kind of question - in similar circumstances, ie wholly avoidable had the victim employed reasonable precautions - in regards to a woman getting attacked, especially a sexual attack, and it causes a furore.
What is the difference? Why is it legitimate to wonder why common sense and reasonable precautions weren't employed in every other circumstance bar that of a woman getting attacked?
And to be clear - for those who are capable or reading and comprehending - this is not to say we should have to modify our behaviour because of criminals. It's merely an acknowledgement of the accepted reality that people do, because you know, we like to keep our persons and our belongings safe.