[quote eldora]@BellatricksStrange
Huh? You've totally missed my point. Sorry but I'm not wasting my time trying again. Go through everything that was said, what I quoted and what I replied, and maybe you'll get it.
This is the classic cop-out answer when you don't have an answer.
The fact is, there is no precaution these women could have taken when faced with the reality of men who hate and want to kill women.
Even if they stayed home, they would be at risk from their own husbands and partners.[/quote]
I'll try one more time.
Let me be clear: I'm not telling anyone to take precautions. Nor am I saying that if they didn't, it was somehow their fault. Clear enough?
What I am challenging is the prevailing outrage when anyone does mention taking precautions. Even the slightest hint, provokes outrage and accusations of victim blaming.
Ok, if that's how you feel, fair enough. But let's test, shall we?
- Do you feel outrage when you see a poster exhorting you not to leave your valuables in clear sight?
- Do you feel outrage when someone suggests not leaving an iphone on a car seat?
- Be honest, if you were to hear of someone who did leave their new iphone on the car seat in a rough neighbourhood, and it got stolen, would the thought cross you mind, "Why did you leave it there?"?
I'm assuming that most people don't get outraged in the above scenarios, and that the above thought does cross their mind.
So my question is, if it is indeed outrageous to suggest people take precautions to ensure their personal safety, why do you not feel the same outrage when it is suggested you don't leave an iphone in clear sight?
I'm not comparing anything with anything. Got it? I'm not comparing anything with anything. Clear enough?
I am just testing the thought process that advising people to take precautions due to their being bad people around is somehow outrageous and victim blaming.