Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What age is too old for a first baby, in your opinion?

258 replies

AbsentmindedWoman · 12/01/2022 16:30

Obviously, there's a wealth of information out there in terms of studies and research. Everyone knows fertility does decline with age, and that risks of things like miscarriage increase.

But women are also having first babies later and later. I'm 37, and because of health issues, have never been in the place to be able to ttc. I don't know if it's just part of the grieving process or not, but I'm not quite ready to fully let go of the idea of a child of my own - I can't accept that it would, realistically, be too late to start trying even if my doctors did miraculously give me the go ahead next year.

Posting in AIBU as people are frank and honest here, without much sugar coating! What do you privately feel is probably too late for a first baby?

OP posts:
Bouncer500 · 12/01/2022 23:38

I wouldn't want to pregnant after 40 but that could be because my 40s body is a wreck because of the 3 DC I had in my 30s. If I hadn't had any children yet I might not feel like an old woman physically and may have been grand to be getting pregnant now. Hard to tell.

Catra · 12/01/2022 23:55

I had my first at 39. I certainly feel didn't 'too old' and most of the mum friends I have are around the same age.

My daughter has numerous health problems (unrelated to the age I had her) She is an absolute joy but running around after her and trying to take care of all her additional needs is hard work. As much part of me would love to have another, at 43 my energy levels have dropped and I feel like I've aged a decade in 4 years! For me, 43 is on the cusp of being 'too old.'

sweetkitty · 12/01/2022 23:56

It’s different for everyone as everyone’s circumstances are different, people have unplanned babies and become parents earlier than they maybe would have chosen and people have infertility issues and need help conceiving so it’s not always black and white.

I hate my first at 29 and my last two months before my 35th birthday, 35 was my cut off point. Having 4 in that timescale utterly knackered me physically and I couldn’t have anymore.

massiveblob · 13/01/2022 00:03
  1. That was mine. It's all good and I have two DC but I'd have prob not carried on if hadn't got pg by 40 (as it was I got pg fast both times)
massiveblob · 13/01/2022 00:06

@BitcherOfBlakiven that shows it's so personal. That's not that far off my ages. But I still work ft and do a ton of volunteer work and my own hobby. My kids do loads too. Every night and clubs etc But we are all high energy!

massiveblob · 13/01/2022 00:07

@Nomoreusernames1244

*Think ppl are mental for having first dc at 45! Womens bodies change a lot post 40 We should enjoying our lives not running around!*

You could say that about any life stage.

Kids at 20! You should be out partying and enjoying yourself not bogged down in nappies!

Kids at 30! You should be getting your career established, not going part time and ruining your earning potential!

Kids at 40! You’re too old! You should have had your kids and be getting your life back!

Not had kids! Oh you’ve missed the boat and will never get to experience that love for a child. Your life is worthless.

Women can’t get it right whatever they do. There’s always someone who’ll judge and say you’ve done it wrong and should have done what they did.

My body is fine post 40, thanks, and hasn’t changed much at all. No more so than any other life stage.

People seem to think women hit 40 and are suddenly exhausted all the time, their ovaries are shrivelling into infertility, and generally past it. Not to mention wrinkly and saggy Hmm

This !!!
Mmr224 · 13/01/2022 00:35

I had my first and 43 and second at 44, 15 months between them. We've been married 10 years and trying 9 years, eventually had IVF due to having to have one ovary and both tubes removed for suspected cancer which was luckily a benign growth instead. My husband is a few years younger than me so just under 40 now, I always thought my cut off was mid to late 30s but I haven't been particularly tired to my surprise, after the newborn phase of no sleep. Maybe helps that I was relatively fit and had a good diet in advance?

CelestiaNoctis · 13/01/2022 01:19

If you want more than 1 then 30. Just 1 child then 45, if you're planning on being a fairly spry and aware 60 year old when they're a teenager.

Superhanz · 13/01/2022 05:51

It's obviously going to be different for everyone due to their circumstances. When I got married aged 30 I never had a number in my head but I probably thought I'd want to be finished having babies aged 35ish. In reality we had unexplained infertility and did ivf which resulted in miscarriage aged 34 and stopped trying really. Had a shock natural pregnancy just before I turned 39. I now have a 8 week old baby and thinking about the next. My cut off for a sibling is age 41 and as for others it's up to them. I sailed through pregnancy and had a c section which I recovered from very quickly, I was out walking on day 4. I'm finding the newborn stage easier than anticipated even though my daughter wakens frequently through the night, 37 isn't too old for a first baby in my opinion.

Cakecakecheese · 13/01/2022 07:16

@Ladywinesalot

After 38 In your 40’s and your selfish You’ll be 50 when your dc is 10

That would have been grandparent age a generation ago

And yes women do have a biological clock

I'm thrilled to know I'm selfish Grin

I'm 41 and pregnant with my first.

londonrach · 13/01/2022 07:26

I had my DD naturally at 41...ideally like her eariler but grateful to have her...I'd say 45 but if I hadn't had DD I'd still be grateful to have her at 45

cabsavpls · 13/01/2022 07:39

For me it was 30, probably seems young to some but I didn't want to enter my 40's with babies. I now have teens and hitting 40 in a couple of months. It feels great to not be tied to very young children. I feel young enough to still do everything in my life I want to and put on hold

I knew I really wanted kids and couldn't imagine a life without them so I prioritised that over a career because we're biologically limited and wanted to give myself every chance. I'm now excelling in my job and financially sound as my kids are getting more expensive!

Bonhex · 13/01/2022 07:41

@Ladywinesalot

After 38 In your 40’s and your selfish You’ll be 50 when your dc is 10

That would have been grandparent age a generation ago

And yes women do have a biological clock

Fgs. My youngest is 15 and I'm 56. So what? I've got wisdom, confidence and financial security. And a killer collection of punk vinyl to annoy the kids with.
AngelsWithSilverWings · 13/01/2022 08:07

These threads always make me laugh when I see peoples posting about anyone over 45 being too knackered to be a parent to young children.

It's entirely down to individual circumstances.

My sister had her first as 43 ( after years of IVF) and is doing fine at 50 with a 6 year old. She is fit and healthy and cycles everywhere with her DD.

I am 51 and my youngest is 13. I run a 5k a few times a week and go to the gym on other days and managed that fine when I had young toddlers ( the Creche at the gym was a life saver!)

People on here often have a strange idea of what being 50 means. I can probably do more than a lot of people 20 years younger than me and I have friends my age who can do even more.

A close friend has kids the same age as mine ( we adopted at the same time) and is 60 next year - she is amazingly fit and healthy. Her only issue is having to also run around after her elderly parents on top of parenting her teenage DC - that's a challenge that I don't have thankfully as my parents are still fit and independent.

CounsellorTroi · 13/01/2022 08:21

@SilkyDressingGown

I think after 45 is probably unusual, but if a woman can get pregnant and carry a child to term, she’s not ‘too old’.
Men can father a child at any age, but I think most people on here would say there comes a point when they are too old!
Bitofachinwag · 13/01/2022 10:08

No Purple I don't have to think that at all. I never said anything about nature or 10 year olds having babies. Those are your words.

user1471523870 · 13/01/2022 11:24

This and this!

I think we are all right or wrong based on our experiences.
For instance, as an older mum, I can never relate much to the comments about 'in your 40s you should enjoy life vs changing nappies'. I am so very happy to be changing nappies in my late forties! I had many many years of nights out, holidays, parties, hobbies, free time etc, all done when I was much younger. Now I enjoy so much a much wanted baby and can't care less.
This to say we are all different. There is no law that dictates that you have to have babies first and 'fun' after or the other way round.

cultkid · 13/01/2022 11:27

34

Hemingwayzcatz · 13/01/2022 11:27

45 but I absolutely wouldn’t judge anyone who had a child older than this. My Mum is 50 and I can’t imagine her having a preschooler like I do, she’d be knackered Grin.

cultkid · 13/01/2022 11:28

But I'm lucky I met someone when I was young enough to mean I have been able to have my child and children before 34

I think it's cruel to ask people to comment on this. I mean surely people just want a baby as soon as they can and it's only because life is so tough as is finding a partner etc for them that they can't have a baby before an ideal age. Nobody would deliberately wait

cultkid · 13/01/2022 11:30

Sorry my comment has also come across as rude and mean I don't mean you're too old or cruel to ask I just think it's really hard to have an ideal age and stick to it. If I met my husband at 40 then I would probably try for the one and give up on trying by about 43

But I think having your first by 34, is kind of the optimum

SVRT19674 · 13/01/2022 11:44

I had mine at 43, she´s 3.5 now. Can´t say I´m particularly tired and I had a super pregnancy. I also had lots of years of doing my own thing so I don´t miss going out or anything like that. If i had a figure in my head it would be something like 45, but it depends on personal health circumstances.

gindreams · 13/01/2022 11:47

@cabsavpls

Smug much ?

LittleGwyneth · 13/01/2022 12:02

Personally, if the universe is kind and things work for me, I'd like to have had three my 36 and be done by then. But that's not an everyone thing, that's a me thing. I think much after 40 is quite late to be having your first, but who am I to judge anyone who is having fertility issues and doesn't get pregnant until their 40s? There are good parents of all ages and bad parents of all ages. Though I will admit I do feel a bit judgemental of that woman who had her first in her sixties, having apparently only started considering having kids in her fifties.

AliasGrape · 13/01/2022 12:05

@user1471523870

This and this!

I think we are all right or wrong based on our experiences.
For instance, as an older mum, I can never relate much to the comments about 'in your 40s you should enjoy life vs changing nappies'. I am so very happy to be changing nappies in my late forties! I had many many years of nights out, holidays, parties, hobbies, free time etc, all done when I was much younger. Now I enjoy so much a much wanted baby and can't care less.
This to say we are all different. There is no law that dictates that you have to have babies first and 'fun' after or the other way round.

I so agree with this.

Lots of people talk about having their life back once kids are a bit older, that they can travel or study or build a career or take up hobbies etc. then. And absolutely that’s great for them - my sister and two of my good friends were in the position of doing things that way round and it’s worked out great for them.

For me, i was very much on track to have children by the ‘optimal’ time as often defined on these threads, then my ex of 12 years cheated and got someone else pregnant instead, my world imploded, I then had multiple bereavements, was caring for a terminally ill parent - life happened basically. And that was all very sad and shit - but there were lots of wonderful things too like travel and friends and further study/ qualifications and flings with wildly unsuitable men and living/ working abroad etc. By the time I met my now husband at 35 I was very very ready to embrace the drudgery of domestic life and parenting - unfortunately it took us till I was 40 to be successful but I’ve never been happier or more content in my life and absolutely don’t feel I’m missing out on anything.

I also don’t feel any older or different physically to when I was 30 - I think these threads are often full of posters assuming that a given age (usually anything with a 0 after it) will automatically equal old/ tired/ decrepit but once they get there themselves they will hopefully find, like I have, that it really isn’t that big a deal. My mum at 70 was more fun, active and outgoing that a lot of 40 year olds I know (including myself possibly), my best mate is 50 and looks about 35, has the best life and most energy of anyone I know, my 86 year old aunt was still working in travel/ tourism until Covid hit, still drives, swims every day, hikes, acts, sings in a choir and has just started a music course at her local university. My uncle at 80 delivered for meals and wheels to help out what he called ‘the old people’ many of whom were 15 years younger than him.

My mum who was 40 when I was born was actually my adoptive mum (sort of, complicated back story but she brought me up). My birth parents were younger and more apparently acceptable ages to become parents - they died at 36 and 42, natural causes.

Of course that’s all anecdotal and of course the risks do increase as you get older, but nobody’s experience is universal - how some people can confidently proclaim that a certain age is too old/ludicrous/selfish etc I just don’t know. All ANYONE can say is what would be their personal cut off (and even then I’m prepared to bet that if things hadn’t worked out how they’d planned, the majority of people would find themselves shifting the goalposts a bit).