I asked you
"Give me one single fact that would remove the right to make the decision from the woman."
And you replied
"One single fact (not relates to this thread) would be if the woman lied about being on contraception"
You said that one situation that in your view would remove from a woman the right to decide to continue a pregnancy would be if she lied about being on contraception.
Those were your words. So you clearly do think that there are situations where a woman should have a forced abortion. Otherwise why did you say that?
When someone else asked you if you actually meant your reply, you said "So it's OK to remove the rights from the man, but not the woman? You can't have it both ways. It's about equally."
Yet again confirming that yes, you believe there should be situations where a woman has a forced abortion.
Then you compared it to rape "If a man lies about wearing a condom it's considered rape in some places. Yet, if a woman lies about contraception and falls pregnant the man has no rights.
How is that fair? I find your views highly disturbing, as you're implying that men have no rights in these scenarios. It's disgusting"
Saying that it is morally wrong that a man has no right to force an abortion. Clearly, again, this is confirming you think he should have that right
Next it was"
"Morally? Equal say in the matter, and the woman should respect that.
Again. Equal say. How does that work when it is something there can be no compromise on? What form would his 'equal say' take?
Then your hypothetical poking holes in the condom argument
"She gets pregnant. The man doesn't want it but she does.
Are you saying that the woman ultimately gets to decide to bring his child into the world against his will after what she done"
Yet again sounds exactly like you think she should be forced to have an abortion.
"But, in some circumstances it isn't ok to force a man to become a father against his will"
Hello again. Isn't ok to force a man to become a father against his will = woman should be forced to abort