Well yes if "girls with penises" are sharing tents/accomodation with "girls with vaginas" as per policy if being treated the same what do you think might happen?
It's a rather logical outworking. Really "girls with penises" shouldn't be sharing accomodation/tents with "girls with vaginas. " Girls with vaginas should be able to have their own safe space where they meet and camp etc eithout risk of pregnancy fromb"girls with penises.".
GG realky needs to be for "girls with vaginas" as if "girls with penises" are allowed everywhere "girls with vagjnas" are then yes condoms etc will need to be available. As will rape counselling etc.
There's a reason that for most of history "people with penises" had separate facilities to "people with vaginas. "
(If only there was a word for "people with vaginas" that acted as a shorthand and could help keep girls safe in situations like this. Language is so important.)