A library thought it appropriate to book this 'entertainment' for children and I feel sick

[flashbac]

I thought it was a joke, a photoshop job, a hoax even but it's not.

WTF

A children's entertainer in a library with this costume?

twitter.com/StandingforXX/status/1414247886242598912?s=19

What the hell is this?

@BrozTito

Erm so dont vote either maybe? You cool with FGM, upskirting,MRAs? dont give it the 'dont have a choice' fucking nonsense. You just love money too much.

And what you're saying is nonsense to use your word.

The Tories have been in power for years even after the brexit shitshow they... Won by a landslide.

That is down imo to labour just making fuckup after fuckup.

The whole momentum infighting- so many caring more about power in the party than getting elected.

The anti semitism left unchallenged not interested. In my part of the world there is a large Jewish community who in general were long term going back generations labour supporters.

Brexit, yes I get that the there were ideological reasons for never wanting us to join but fucking hell it was years ago. Hopeless. No it wasn't party political but. I for one thought that was shit.

Corbyn was passionate but a poor leader.
Starmer has zero charisma. I thought he would be good. Nope.

And yes the utter fuck you to women.

None of the parties have ever given a shit about women.

So yeah Tory landslide and shit opposition who was more interested in internal power fights than loads of their core traditional voters.

Someone on another thread said. They openly despise groups that they then expect to vote for them.

None of this is the fault of one woman on the internet.

To say she is aok with young girls being mutilated with no anaesthetic to meet the demands of men.
That she is cool with upskirting... How many women do you know who have never had dodgy experiences with men? You have no idea of her history and yet you say she is ok with girls being violated in this way by men... She's complicit in their actions... Women are not responsible for the sex crimes men commit. Such a 'progressive' comment.

You have no idea how much money OP has. Really random accusation. Unless you have good reason to believe the name is a cover for jrm or something?!

Telling a woman NOT TO VOTE because you disagree with who she may vote for. Again so progressive. Women can vote for who they fucking well want. Trying to shame a woman into doing what you want, with outrageous accusations, is appalling.

As for MRA? I don't know who you are or anything but if there's anyone with MRA attitudes on this thread you need to look closer to home.

Fyi re the politics thing

Years ago on here there was a suggestion to vote for a woman. Irrespective.

I thought it was bonkers.

But then more recently I thought.

When women are awful - we can all think of examples of horrible female politicians.

How often are they worse than the men?

They get judged hard. Esp by women.

Ok there are some women I would never vote for BUT in general women have experiences in their lives and friends who have experienced stuff and often children and etc. They have been girls. They say least have women and children (almost always) somewhere in their thoughts.

With the vast majority of male politicians we are not in their thoughts. Not on the agenda. Not considered. Used as a reason sometimes for something (Afghanistan) but it's not real.

It's reflected in the way the media structures stories.

Conflict, economy, trade, terrorism etc. All important.

Children in poverty, sexual abuse of children, sex offences in general, DV, child support, things where the NHS have fucked up massively with women's health etc.
Women's pages. Subheading. Less important.

In reality these are massive important societal issues. But historically and generally not in men's remit.

Anyway. That's an option. Vote for women. Whatever party. Because whatever shit so many are spouting at the moment most don't believe it. Men in general. Don't care no idea not my problem.

So there's s thought.

Eweh. That’s disturbing.

And I thought Noseybonk was bad enough from back in the day.
But that is disgusting.

Noseybonk!

This is creepy as fuck.

This needs to be read too
grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/monkey-see-monkey-dildo

Take note especially of this section, especially those asking the difference between "queer" and "gay":

"SC: …queer theorists do make the argument that all social norms need to be transgressed and that is a progressive force of queering. For example, BDSM is seen as a “queer” identity. And queer theory argues that there is not material harm done by, for example, someone beating someone with a whip and getting sexual pleasure from it, but that the social harm comes from the marginalization of certain groups who are seen as deviant, such as BDSM practitioners or paedophiles.

For example, Michel Foucault, in a 1978 radio interview, was advocating for France to abolish the age of sexual consent –

DJ: As in down to infants, as in down to any age?

SC: As in down to infants, yes. Make it so there was no restriction on sexual consent.

DJ: He’s not unique. Pat Califia also said that any child old enough to be able to choose whether he or she wants to wear shoes is old enough to participate in sex, by which she doesn’t mean playing “doctor,” but instead Pat Califia has written child torture porn.

SC: Oh my god.

DJ: Anyway, so go ahead.

SC: So yeah, this is quite a common argument amongst queer theorists, and Foucault himself made the argument in a radio interview. He said that there is not actually harm done by adult males raping children, but rather that children are merely constructed, socially constructed as a vulnerable population through various psychological, medical and legislative discourses, and that the paedophile is merely socially constructed as a figure, as a phantom. They’re nothing more than a phantom, and that the creation of this phantom through the law on sexual consent would actually cause the social harm and be carried out on the bodies of men, and women and children throughout society."

It beggars belief that ANYONE who cares about children's safety can advocate for this dangerous trend.

You cool with FGM

The Conservatives have Nimco Ali...

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimco_Ali

NiceGerbil : interesting point. Young me would have said you are unreasonable but old me thinks it a good rule of thumb in a world of marginal political choices.

I don't vote Conservative btw. I just find this prevailing attitude that Labour are a force for good baffling. They definitely have their faults too. And have shown time and again that women's rights mean nothkng to them. Which is why I keep spoiling my ballot papers.

Anyway, back to the topic in hand. The Independent actually did a decent write-up of this. Colour me surprised.

www.google.com/amp/s/www.indy100.com/news/redbridge-library-monkey-custome-scandal-b1882666%3famp

Take note especially of this section, especially those asking the difference between "queer" and "gay":

Yes, this is important to understand.

It seems as though bringing drag queen story hour into children's libraries does bring into the children's lives in touch with adult bahaviours and sexuality.
Drag is for an adult audience.

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

And children suffering child sexual abuse saw real human male penises.

Your point is?

Let's groom all children to accept cock?

Nah, you're OK, we will pass.

Horses don't walk around with permanent elections and that rainbow dildo butt monkey has never been seen in nature.

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

Are you drinking?

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

Oh yay!!!

Were they erect in any degree? Were they dressed up as men with penises? Were they encouraging people to touch their penises? Were they shaking them engorged around in people’s, including children’s, faces?

Or is this just another completely irrelevant comment and analogy?

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

Last time I checked, animals don't sexually abuse children but do carry on with the noncy BS.

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr that is the most asinine post I’ve seen for a while. Be serious.

@candycane222

Isn't it odd that people are determined to defend ehat Mandinga did even while Mandinga themselves are frantically trying to conceal the evidence. It so - kneejerky.

I mean - "anatomically correct"??

According to Brian Blessed, gorillas have very small penises. So that massive pink dildo is anything but "anatomically correct".

@TheWeeDonkey

It was said earlier on here wasn't it? There is a sector of society that is totally obsessed with worshipping the blessed cock and these people seem to be getting the upper hand, normalising and excusing inesxcusable behaviour. The desire for (some) men to demonstrate their predilictions in public is more important than anything else.

In a nutshell. Penis cult.

Please do enlighten us as to the percentage of sexual assaults and rapes of children that are carried out by dogs and horses?

I'm always amazed when posters come on here and try to excuse sexual exposure to minors, grooming, and obscene behaviour. I do wish we had a button to report them to get their hard drives checked as if they excuse this behaviour in others what are they doing themselves?

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

Why do people come up with this pathetic, risible nonsense and think it's some form of 'gotcha' argument?

That is the level of their thought, reasoning and justification for the bare arsed, rainbow dildo monkey. Pitiful.

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

Aw mate, youre a dick. Ain't a gotcha.

@brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This morning I saw :

• A real dog’s bollocks
• A real horse cock

And I thought : “jesus, what if a child had seen that ???”

Make all animals wear underpants for the sake of the children

This morning, I saw this post and thought “what a crock of bull shit”

Though maybe I should just say shit - as blaming bulls is just turning it back on the animal world again.