@saraclara
If a man who says he feels like a woman is allowed to demand to be treated as a literal woman, why can a woman who feels like a widow not be allowed to say she is a widow?
Well if you have a problem with the former, then unless you are a total hypocrite, you should also have a problem with the latter, surely?
Yes, and I’ve already said that when we can cancel the situations surrounding these women and the TWAW mantra that so many chant, then it might be possible also to cancel the this terminology. Whilst one or more entities persist in setting out rigid demands in language and terminology on the one side, there needs to be reciprocity in language and terminology on the other, and the same standards applied across the board.
However just in case you actually cannot see it, there are some big differences here, so your point really isn’t the gotcha you think it is.
Firstly, one is a reaction to the other. The acting party cannot expect the other party not to react. That’s not how it works. You set the arena, you had better expect me to protect my interests and those of other women within that arena.
Also, and more importantly, one seeks to create a metaphorical picture and does not claim direct equivalence. The other demands a literal and direct equivalence (which does not exist and never will - sex is biological fact, and immutable).
Several other differences have also been outlined on this thread.
However as this topic has been discussed on two different threads now, and as OP has spoken about her personal circumstances, which lends some understand as to why she posted this, I’ve decided I’ve say what I need to say.