Its a way of pretending economic discrimination doesn't exist and that poverty is far more likely to hinder your life opportunities.
Its word salad made up by people with money.
Its fascinating to see how its mainly left wing women who objected to it in the uk initially, many with long track records fighting discrimination. They believe in women's rights, gay rights and workers rights. And have fought hard to gain them. Only to be smeared as right wing Christian fundamentalists which bares no resemblance to the truth.
Why? Ask why the need and desire to do this?
At the same time as being asked to suspend believe in sex and ignore its existence by being taught its a social construct. We all including trans activists, indeed trans activists in particular, know this isn't true. Trans is a reference to sex. You can't be trans without knowing your sex. You can't have a trans identity without acknowledging your sex.
The privilege here is being allowed to say this. Its not women who are allowed to do this. They are labelled as bigoted for mentioning that sex in sport is important because of hormones, muscle structure, muscle strength, height and lung capacity. We are allowed to point out that only women can give birth because of their sex and the can dress up however they bloody like they still run the risk of pregnancy unless they take contraception, harmful drugs with massive side effects and have invasive surgery. And even if infertile are seen as sexual objects and property first before humans. Or if they are past the age of fertility are thought of as bitter, over opinionated and undesirable. Or simply rape or sexual assault targets. All things primarily framed by the gaze of men wanting to get their leg over.
Thats supposed to be a privilege.
Again something framed by the gaze of men who see women's sexuality as their primary asset and get pissed off, if they want that for themselves.
If we dont reject this and decide to all become transman then we are accepting of all this as privilege. We endorse gender stereotypes which suggest our brains fall out at puberty and are happy at being leered at, groped or otherwise targeted physically or verbally for our bodies. Our sexed bodies.
Pointing out that there is are abnormally high correlations between young girls on social media in the west, autism, homophobia, sexual abuse, poor mental health and this manifesting in clusters which are not random in nature but socially connected is bigotted. Pointing out that there is a very definite difference between ages and onset of trans identity in males and females which in other medical settings would ring alarm bells about being completely different cohorts and causation is bigotted. This is because one group benefits from the existence of the other. In other situations you could point out the exploitation of women and girls by older males but not this one. Its not lost on me that the side effects of hormones and surgery are disproportionately worse for females who transition than men, but we can't talk about that. And that drugs used on children (mostly girls) are still experimental and we cant see the research into whether they provide benefits because thats bigotted.
Shouting about cis is supporting mens right activism and preventing proper discussion about where discrimination really happens. If we want to talk snd tackle discrimination we need to observe reality and tackle problems. Not bury heads in sand under the cover of cis nonsense.
Thats not to say trans people aren't discriminated against. Thats say that we can't talk about abuse, harm, economics, exploitation and violence because there is a social hierarchy we must observe which is completely blind to reality and to point this out is bigotted.
Cis privilege is a shield to stop discussion of this to protect males and to sustain ownership and control over women. The end.
And thats why the term is highly offensive.