@ExhaustedGrinch
Can't believe some people suggesting kick the husband out!
It must be a difficult and thankless task at the best of times raising someone else's children, yet the DH has done just that for 12 years. Now that the kids are older and he wants to be able to sleep, undisturbed, in his own home when he's up at 3am suddenly he's some selfish ogre who needs kicking to the curb?! Never mind the 12yrs he's raised someone else's children! Unbelievable.
Exactly! People on this thread have very warped and disturbing views.
The husband HAS to wake at 3am for work.
The son does NOT HAVE to have his son on overnights (I would have thought the baby was far too young to spend one night overnight, let alone an entire weekend!), he can have his child during the day.
So, which is non-negotiable and which isn't? Which is urgent, and which isn't.
Is it negotiable for when her son has his son, during day or during night? YES. Is it urgent for him to have his son overnight, every...second....weekend, AND two nights in the middle of the week? NO.
Is it negotiable when the husband works? NO. Is it urgent for the husband to get up at 3am and go to work? YES.
That, is what it boils down to. NEEDS, vs wants. The husband NEEDS to go to work, the son does NOT 'need' to have his son at night. The son can have the baby during the day, at least until he's two or three years old and can sleep through without crying/screaming.
I think day visits only until the baby is two or three, is a fair enough compromise.
And I also think maybe OP's household relies on her husband having his job and earning a living, and if I deciphered her post (she said her DH is a Bin 'Nan' I am presuming she means Bin Man, ie garbage man), her husband works with big, heavy industrial equipment. If he did something wrong due to lack of sleep and was sacked, could she cope with the lack of income? Or if he had an accident due to lack of sleep and hurt himself or worse, could she live with that?
Common sense says she must priorities the NEEDS of her husband, over the 'wants' of her son. Working with big heavy industrial equipment is no joke, and if she needs her husband's income, she'd best get her priorities straight and ensure DH is best equipped to work with big heavy industrial equipment.
Otherwise, if she can cope if DH has a workplace accident that incapacitates him or worse, or becomes unemployed, prioritise the irresponsible son and then cope on only one income.