So many conclusions are being made. I asked originally if it was unreasonable to think it was a waste of money and to think it reasonable that I should have a say in what 'our' money is spent on. I think what I should of asked was AIBU to think of my DH's earnings as ours rather than his after 25 years together and being a SAHM for many of those 25 years
Yes, you should have a say. No, you should not have a veto. You’ve said your dh can easily re-earn the money as he’s a high earner. You have savings. He’s offered you an equivalent amount for frippery if you want it. Personally I think it’s better for partners to have separate accounts for personal spending money. Like the couple on the other “buying an expensive item without telling him” thread, we are one “save and splurger” and one “drip drip drip daily pointless crap-er” so separate works for us. Joint works if nobody spends any money ever or you have very similar habits.
SAHP are undoubtedly an enormous support to a working parent, including financially during the expensive pre school years. Unless there is an enormous back story of an unusually high number of children or children with additional needs then it very much sounds like you’ve stretched the sahp period to breaking point. You are simultaneously talking about childcare costs like you have a pair of toddlers and imminent university costs like you have a pair of sixth formers (maybe you have one of each but didn’t think it relevant). The reality is, although £60k+ (+plus not that much I suspect given the monthly income) is a good salary but not one where it is the norm to support a non working spouse forever. It’s not normal or usual to not work (or barely work) for 25 years but you sound genuinely surprised that you are now expected to do so. Whatever agreement you had in the past that you are a sahp/unemployed, has broken down. This was probably inevitable and certainly predictable.
You may well be being abused/controlled/treated unfairly etc but spending £4K on a one off not a bike when you earn £60k and have £50k savings and expecting your partner to make a contribution to the family finances (which, again, boils down to how old the children are) are not in themselves abusive.
I’ve always regarded all our money (what we brought in at the start, earnings and inheritance) as “our money” through the back and forth of periods of unemployment or studying or high earning or (me) being a sahp. I honestly don’t know if I’d still feel like that if DH was going to not earn anything for several decades of his earning life, long after children had started school (I’m assuming based on university concerns) and with no responsibilities beyond normal adult life. I do know I wouldn’t take to kindly to being told I wasn’t allowed to spend what I was earning. Maybe that’s really unfair but it’s more expensive to support another adult who is not working through choice than it is to buy not a bike so I’d resent being told I couldn’t. Different with small children as it’s often cheaper to support the sahp to not work to save childcare expenses. (Even if more expensive it’s often the preferred choice ideologically so worth the money)
I have found that during my non earning periods I have found it quite stressful due to not really having much control over income/savings. I panic and don’t want to spend (I think because I personally can’t replace it). During my periods of being the sole earner I’ve found the responsibility stressful. I wouldn’t want to be in either position for very long periods.