Penis-haver

[Blue4YOU]

AIBU to start referring to all men as penis-hackers (inspired by the absurd NHS policy re people who menstruate thread)?
Hi, here’s my penis-haver X who I’m married to, my penis-haver friend Y and I was assaulted by a penis-haver paediatrician?

Is a spaffer the same as a wanker? Never heard it .

I think a spaffer is the same as an ejaculator, you're getting mixed up with tossers. Easy mistake to make.

@SarahBellam

Trouser Snakers.

Love it!

@sandgrown

Is a spaffer the same as a wanker? Never heard it .

I had to google ''Spaff''...Have heard of ''Spaffing money up the wall''

I assumed to splurge or waste, but it can also mean ejaculate.

@fairynick

Trans men are men.

Ok..... and 'cis women' are women..... so why is it OK to call them cis?

@TabbyStar

Is a spaffer the same as a wanker? Never heard it .

I think a spaffer is the same as an ejaculator, you're getting mixed up with tossers. Easy mistake to make.

A ''Tosser'' can only be a male.

If a female was to do this action on her partner, it wouldn't make her a ''Tosser''

Males and Females toss pancakes, and ''Cabers'', but only a penis owner can be a ''Tosser'', I think?

Surely just XX and XY... No arguments possible.

@oakleaffy

I fear one could toss someone else off, thus making you a tosser.

We would maybe need to abstain from tossing anyone off to retain our womanly identity, should ‘tosser’ be the chosen name.

I’m good with that.

How about everyone else?

Cervices is the correct plural of cervix, BTW OP

Apologies if somone has already pointed it out in this hectic thread

Why can a tosser only be male? I could toss off my (male with a penis) partner if I wanted - wouldn't I then be the tosser?

@confuseddotcomma

Surely just XX and XY... No arguments possible.

Now you say that but what about the xxy’s?

He'd be the tossee

Welll we need to be clear here....
Are they ‘cut-cock’ or ‘skin-cock’ havers!

@PussGirl

Cervices is the correct plural of cervix, BTW OP

Apologies if somone has already pointed it out in this hectic thread

Cervices.

Like services.

Interesting.

Willy waver

[quote Mmn654123]@oakleaffy

I fear one could toss someone else off, thus making you a tosser.

We would maybe need to abstain from tossing anyone off to retain our womanly identity, should ‘tosser’ be the chosen name.

I’m good with that.

How about everyone else?[/quote]
This is just hilarious

"cervixes" is also acceptable

Is onanist male-sex specific?

Urgh, my dh only has one testicle, what category does he go in?

... Statistically he has the average number of testicles for a human being (all cervix havers and prostate owners combined), does he get a special name? And a prize? And time out of work to attend every potential reproductive organ seminar?

Onanist is specifically to do with semen, so male sex related but not necessarily gender

Male sex specific I ought to have said

@peak2021

It would not surprise me if many men feel that referring to women as 'people who menstruate' is objectionable as many/most women do. Though it does not affect them hardly at all if at all.

Should we not be trying to get men to be allies against this offensiveness and continue to call women women?

That's the point though, by illustrating what it would be like if they were treated the same way they will wake up to what is going on.

Person who leaves the toilet seat up?

@R0wantrees

Is onanist male-sex specific?

Very good question.

I fear not.

Onanist has two definitions.

A trans man likely may meet one definition.

And a trans woman may meet either or both definitions.

@Mytiredeyeshaveseenenough

Person who leaves the toilet seat up?

My cleaner is a man? Wow. I’d never have guessed.

@PussGirl

Onanist is specifically to do with semen, so male sex related but not necessarily gender

Hmmmm

onanist (plural onanists)

a man who masturbates
a man who uses coitus interruptus as a means of birth control