@Sooverthis1
The comments here about ppl with siblings is actually really insulting at times "children mauling each other instead of sharing, we have way more time, more money , we are NC with all my dh's siblings as apparently they are all awful and they all hate each other anyway" etc, etc etc...
It's basically a summation of how much better it is to have one dc and a pile on of stories about how miserable more than one-child families are!
It's amazing that so many ppl who have one child know of so many other families (with more than one dc) who all hate each other and leave their parents to get eaten by their dogs once they are old as none of the 5 person family wants to know and also they all don't talk to each other

Like if you are happy with your set up and your family then that's all that matters, there's plenty of negativity about big families also.
Also all your arguments for only children on this thread make it sound like you have made the best decision ever so what else is there to say?
The majority of the posts here have tried to focus on the negatives of having more than one and almost rejoicing in it. It's not great and the argument of "ppl are mean about us" is lame and a bit of a contradiction. There will be ppl who are happier being onlies and ppl who aren't, that's life and no amount of reassuring yourselves either way will help tbh.
Yes, and there will be people who are happier with siblings and people who aren't. That's also life.
I agree that neither family model is inherently "better" for children, and I have no personal choices to defend as having an only child was not actually a choice for us. I always assumed that I would have two, because that seems to be the default, but nature had other ideas. I miscarried her only sibling and never managed to conceive another.
I think what you are failing to understand, @Sooverthis1, is the extent of judgment that still persists about only children. By your own admission further up the thread, you have been blissfully unaware of this, but those of us with only children are acutely aware of the negative stereotypes that abound. There are a few examples on this thread. When dd was younger, I was told on several occasions by complete strangers that I was selfish for not "giving" dd a sibling. I was advised that she would grow up selfish, or spoilt or lonely or whatever. It seems that all manner of negative personality traits are ascribed to being only children, whereas those with siblings are assumed to have positive impacts only. This is why people are eager to redress the balance by pointing out that having siblings doesn't always live up to the rosy ideal that it is portrayed to be, nor are people with siblings all wonderful and selfless beings with perfect social skills.
I don't think being an only child is better than having siblings, but I don't think it's worse either. It took me a while to come to that realisation, because I had unwittingly absorbed a lot of the negative stereotypes about only children that are prevalent in our society. Initially, I felt guilty about not giving dd a sibling, but as time went on, I realised that the stereotypes were all crap anyway, that there were lots of positives that balanced out any negatives, and that there were so many other factors that were actually far more important than having a sibling or not.
I think people are just trying to make the point that there are pros and cons either way, and that kids may be happy or unhappy in either scenario.