Reciprocating friendship doesn’t need to be in the same format as it is received. You can be invited for dinner and reciprocate by hosting a picnic in the park.
It’s fine to go to someone’s as a one off and not reciprocate.....but that friendship probably isn’t going to grow.
We are talking here about those who serially accept invites and never reciprocate in any form. That’s what people are passed off about....those who say yes to every invitation and thoroughly enjoy being hosted by others. These are not the anti-social sort who don’t want to see anyone anywhere. They are social leaders people who have decided it’s fine to accept hospitality but because they don’t like having people in their personal space (home) or find cooking stressful, or have a small place, that they will never reciprocate in any form at all but just receive.
That’s not okay. Those people who don’t intend to invite anyone back OR offer to host a picnic in a public space (because their place is too small) or to ever offer to buy a takeaway for the others, or to dream up another way of showing friendship EVER, really should just decline invitations. Friendship doesn’t have to be about equal and identical reciprocity but it is a 2-way street and anyone who is only interested in taking and not in giving in any form, beyond in the time of crisis or the short term, can’t expect the friendship to thrive.
Martyrs will now say that they will never accept an invitation again because they are being judged for not having people back for. 3 course meal. No, that isn’t what has been said....what has been said is friendship must be returned in SOME FORM. Imagination can be used to decide how that best works for each person, but they do need to think about it and do something.
The whole nature of friendship is it is 2 way. Sometimes one gives much more than another and that’s fine, but if only 1 side ever gives and the other only ever receives it’s not actually a friendship is it.