You're completely missing my point. I now have a child who is scared of dogs because of walks in a normal suburban seaside area. Where exactly do you think we should be going, are we allowed outdoors? I highly doubt that posters who are scared of dogs or whose children are scared of dogs are going to dog parks or areas where dogs are encouraged to be off lead and run around. They're going to shared spaces like parks, beaches, coastal walks, high streets (!) and can reasonably expect not to be approached by strange dogs.
Not missing the point at all.
You haven't written a post full of hyperbole and dramatics (the very thing I was amused by), though I'm not sure why you're going on about your right not to be approached by off lead dogs. That wasn't even what I was talking about.
Only on MN dog threads can you point out the lack of logic in being apparently quaking with fear at the sight of an off lead dog whilst repeatedly going places where dogs can be, and are, legally exercised off lead and get the responses:
- haha how far gone are you, you think humans should make way for dogs
- but where should we go, we have a right not to be approached by off lead dogs
... when nobody's saying humans make way for dogs, and nobody is saying off lead dogs should be allowed to jump and pounce.

I used to be scared of dogs, like your DC. Like your DC, I went to beaches and parks and was wary of dogs. They are, however, places where people are allowed to exercise their dogs off lead though. Crucially, and this is what people on these threads seem incapable of accepting, accepting that off lead exercise is perfectly reasonable and within the law is not saying it's ok for dogs to be charging at or jumping at people.
Surely if someone if utterly terrified at the very thought of seeing some dogs minding their own business off lead, they'd not be going somewhere fellow citizens are behaving within the law?