Not relevant on his fame, the point being that people defended her when it wouldn't be done to him. The extent of the beating again is another cop put- assault is assault.
His level of fame is entirely relevant - because men can beat, rape and kill women and still hold the privilege of fame and success.
Assault is not all the same - not that it's a competition but Rihanna's beating was far more brutal than what Caroline Flack's boyfriend had done to him. I can't say I've personally seen anyone defend her, but seeing as she died shortly after it happened there was acknowledgment that her issues were more complex than just "husband beater".
Yes but this is not REDDIT, it is mn and a site where many posters go mad over men displaying such behavior yet do it themselves on the same site.
You've picked out one thread - bravo. Maybe actually compare languages used in how men speak about women vs how women speak about men. I've never seen any gratuitously violent language used towards men in a thread about attractive males. It's utterly rife in threads about women ("I'd destroy her" etc)
Again doesn't counteract every single case nor does it permit the ethos that money a man inherits is ''family money'' but when a woman inherits it's ''her money''.
My original point still stands on this, you haven't really argued against it. Women are wise to protect themselves financially in a way a man shouldn't need to be. My fight is more with this normality and this system rather than women protecting themselves
Do you know what, I absolutely love it when thinly veiled MRA's come on this site, try to call us all man haters and get their arses handed to them. Aside from the fact that you're not half as clever as you think you are (one username going on all the threads crying about the menz) I'm sure you assumed - because patriarchy - we are just a site full of silly housewives, rather than intelligent women who eat MRAs like you for breakfast. Spill your apologist illogical nonsense on somewhere like 4chan, you have no place here.