you don't ever speak to staff like thats it's workplace bullying.
Unless you're Tom Cruise, apparently.
I read the question in the OP as a hypothetical one. A PP suggests there are enough examples of misogynistic discrimination out there that invented scenarios are unhelpful. I can see that point, and also see that the language of women - both spoken and non-verbal - is policed more rigorously than that of men. On a micro-level that would be things like manspread. Or taking up more space than women. Or giving women and girls advice that, in order to protect themselves from possible predators, they should make themselves, their freedoms, and the parameters of their lives, narrower and smaller. Women pepper our language with apologism. We're socially conditioned to do it. It's a habit we can break if we recognise it but this can be surprisingly difficult and meet with hostile reactions. Women are not meant to be assertive. Examples: apologising whenever we can. Defensive language, like 'just'. Hedging, or tag questions, or qualifiers and disclaimers. Tentative speech.
Since we're talking about Cruise, take Hollywood. Mel Gibson, anti-Semite and proven abuser who admits to striking his partner when holding their child, is caught red-handed and lies low for a while. He's now back in work. His ex is lambasted as a gold digger. There is unassailable evidence as to his behaviour. In which case 'she must have pushed his buttons'. Just look at what you made me do.
Take Johnny Depp. Sues The Sun (nobody asked him to) for libel: Court decides on balance of probabilities they were correct to call him a 'wife beater'. How could they not? He admitted to headbutting her in court. Response? 'But she did it as well!' (It wasn't a criminal trial and this isn't what the Court were being asked to decide). Only Depp's fans were surprised by the ruling and instantly launched a petition to have Heard ousted from her movie project. To this end they were gleefully egged on by Depp who seems to be amply proving her point. SHE is the censored one here.
Now take Rose McGowan. (Well, she's crackers anyway, right)? Take Ashley Judd. Take Annabella Sciorra. Take Jessica Hynes. Take any woman who eventually stood up, asserted their boundaries, said 'no' to coercion and rape, said 'no' to female exploitation in Hollywood. Who didn't assert any form of aggression toward males, but demanded males stop their aggression to them.
The response? They should have sacrificed their careers rather than end up on the casting couch. They should have said something at the time (how?) They want money. They are 'jumping on the bandwagon'. Or, more frequently, they're probably lying. (Any doubt as to what responses are normally meted out to women who openly state they have been victims of male aggression or sexual abuse, do one quick Twitter search of #MeToo). The pattern is clear here. The moral we're supposed to absorb from it is clear too. Men can get away with aggression. Are encouraged to get away with it. Women should put up, shut up, suck it up, and if they end up victims should take the blame.
OP's assumptions might not be empirically-based, but neither are they a wild card. They're entirely logical.