[quote Redolent]@Goosefoot
I agree that school is a unique context and that the same ‘rules’ don’t always apply as in adulthood. But we’re not simply talking about 10 year olds. The advice given here also applies to 15-16 year olds and they are also capable of causing real harm to one another.
Messaging is crucial but how many parents really get it right? And how many children grasp that violence should be deployed in a very limited way? Some children will internalize ‘if they hit you, hit back harder’ as ‘it’s OK to hit’...or ‘it’s fine to hit if you feel like you’ve been wronged’.[/quote]
I think many children are quite capable of understanding that the advice to hit back has limits, for example, only if the other person initiated the conflict, that taunting or teasing etc is not acceptable to incite another person to violence, or that if the person is weaker or smaller or impaired in some way it may be the wrong choice.
Clearly the parent giving the advice will need to try and communicate this sort of thing to the child, and carry on refining it over time. Often that happens pretty naturally though, as they talk together about things that have happened, situations they see around them, and so on. And it might be that some children need firmer boundaries as they are unable to decide what is right.
Teens of course are in a different situation, they know and can discern more, and often a bully may not be dealt with so simply. Most are pretty capable of understanding that, however, and in fact can see that it's so without anyone telling them. If your bully is a foot taller and a wall of muscle, or is likely to carry a knife, or is a member of a criminal gang, it's probably not a good idea to hit them back.
OTOH, at that age, it's not so often that one kid will hit another because they just have the self-control of a nine year old. Non-violent aggression is more common in teens and requires different solutions.