To be fair brefugee, OP had already made up a bottle, and was getting dinner ready.
well quite, and OPs partner was BU when he said she didn't care about the baby.
But microplastics in food and the ingestion thereof isn't something that has suddenly appeared in the papers. It has been a matter of concern for some time, and it getting in the food chain has been a matter of concern for some time. Most of us know about microfibres and washing machines and fish being found with microplastic in them.
And i think that if i was feeding my baby from plastic bottles (which i did on occasion because i expressed) and my DP brought this article to my attention, i would read it. Because i know that the environment we live in is harmful these days in a way that it wasn't when i was a child.
If there are a few small changes you could make to your routine to mitigate this, why wouldn't you make it? There has never ever been a better time for finding information easily, either, and it is very easy to find the source material for this study.
When my DC were babies, toys were often made of that super soft plastic. Until suddenly they weren't because it was shown to be dangerous. Do you think we continued to let our babies play with them? How about sleeping positions? Forward facing car seats? We are constantly getting new and better techniques for things and it would be daft to dismiss them out of hand because no newspaper doesn't have some kind of political agenda.
What is the agenda behind this being reported when more than one newspaper reports it?
I mean if we distrust science so much why aren't we all living in asbestos riddled houses?