@Viviand
Seems to me that the OP thinks she is better than the two men and should come first. I don't know if she is, but it doesn't matter a sausage roll who comes first. She is the boss of her department and that is what matters. If position in a list is her major concern, then she must have a very sad life. At least her name is on the list!
What if she
is better?
What if she's been better than them for the last two decades? (I've no idea how old OP is and if a twenty year career history is even an option for her.)
What if she's consistently been rising to the occasion and has been compensating for the professional shortcomings of her mediocre male peers?
What if she's literally ranked #1 out of a workforce of 4k on performance?
...
And what if she isn't and hasn't?
What if she's just average? Don't men demand recognition for making an effort even when the results are less than stellar?
What if - out of three main contributors - she's technically the one who contributed only 31%, which technically falls short of a completely equal 33.33333...% percent she should have contributed? Would a male lead accept this as a reason for him getting slightly less recognition? [Reality check: like fuck - and, yes, I said "fuck" again, I'm just not very ladylike, I'm afraid - he would. Any old mediocre but ambitious man in the corporate world would take this as an invitation to launch into a lengthy speech om quality vs. quantity. Because penis. And, yes, I also just said "penis".)
And, FWIW, exceptionally talented women face sexism. But my hypotheticals matter because exceptional women arenonly ever so slightly disadvantaged compared to exceptionally talented men. But once you compare mediocre men to mediocre women, that's when the sexism shit really hits the fan.
There are two reasons why men unashamedly self-promote in corporate office poltics and women don't:
-
Men are socialised to engage in willy waving contests. Women are socialised not to.
-
Women are not stupid - and all the empirical data availablenon the subject suggest that men are being rewarded for this behaviour while women are being penalised. Look up the studies on perceptions on men vs. women negotiating compensation. Look up data on "assertive" vs. "bossy".
Does this enrage me? Fuck yes, it does! (Also, shit! I said "fuck" again ... no wonder I haven't made CEO yet!). Can I changebit single-handedly? No, I'm not delusional and I do know my limits. Will I unconditionally support every single woman challenging any tiny aspect of this culture of structural sexism? Like, FUCK, YEAH!