Everyone crapping in about a six year old being ‘only a child’ and ‘a bit annoying’ while ignoring the fact that a ten year old is also a child, with child emotions and lacking in adult thought process and capabilities.
Indeed the ten year old IS also a child. My problem and reasoning for 'crapping in' is not with regards to the ten year old action but the awful attitudes of the grown adults on here suggesting the 6 year old deserved it.
I’m also uncomfortable with those saying “it’s never ok to kick someone in the face under any circumstances”. I’ll sure as shit be teaching my daughter it’s ok to defend herself if she needs to or she’s being violated.
Probably you would have stepped in at the point OP failed though, so the situation would not have escalated.
I reckon the responses would also be very different if the six year old in question was a boy.
Well not really, a 6 year old is a 6 year old.
There would be cries about him growing up to be a perv or a peeping Tom and a quick kick in the face might teach him a lesson.
Actually, this has rather bizarrely been given as a possible!
I can’t imagine a ten year old could kick hard enough under a small gap in a closed door to actually cause any damage, the posts about lost teeth or eyesight are quite hysterical.
It's not about what you can imagine. The potential to damage was there. Minimal risk re teeth and eyes, but a risk all the same. Or are you planning to teach your children it's ok to kick someone if there is no permanent risk to them?
If someone stuck their head under a door while I was changing, I can’t guarantee I wouldn’t boot them right off the bat, let alone give four warnings.
Another non comparable situation.
Why do we hold children to higher standards than we would an adult?
We don't. People have been jumping for joy about a six year old getting a kick to the face.