seaweedandmarchingbands it's interesting how you want the plan details, but have ignored the incident where the teacher needn't have done what she did as she wasn't teaching that day.
But here's what happened.
The Head contacted me and said she felt DS3 needed to eat a snack at morning break. She believed his behaviour after break was blood sugar related. (I don't, I think it's the short transitions as he doesn't deal with them well).
(Something had happened during the previous school year (Yr1) and DS3 was adamant he was not allowed a snack.)
Head said he could bring in sweets, DS3 still wasn't entertaining the idea. I said I could bring him up a chocolate milk carton, he was into this idea but he didn't want anyone to know and it had to be a secret. Head assured him, said he would be brought to the office area we were in, I suggested the adults and DS3 could say it was his medicine time. Head agreed.
1st day, all done to plan. Jubilant email as he had been calm after break.
Day 2, I had a meeting with SENCo first thing, she had the plan written up, needed a couple of minor amendments. Said there was no TA in his class that morning so she (SENCo) was taking DS3 for his snack. I reiterated how it must be a secret and discretion was needed. SENCo confirmed teacher was also aware.
I picked DS3 asked to sign document. on the way home DS3 said the "secret was destroyed". He'd gone with a classmate to have his medicine and she'd stayed and seen everything.
I queried with school and was told yes that happened, classmate was supposed to come straight back, not stay. The SENCo says she was on the phone.
You'll probably say the teacher made a judgement call and his classmate should have followed the instruction (they are 6, Yr2). I say when DS3 is being disruptive they always find another adult to remove him, and she's decided DS3's need for privacy is low priority.
The SENCo tried to push it back on me, saying was I ok with him going to the office alone? I pointed out the arrangements were down to the school, I hadn't asked for him to be accompanied and I wasn't taking the responsibility from them on this one.
A huge problem is after a really bad Yr1, there's no adults DS3 feels safe around, he hated being "tricked". I also resent persuading him into something only for them not to follow it. I would never ask for him to have milkshake and sweets during the school day. He's isolated enough socially without his classmates knowing he's getting treats.
Which is the same issue with the teacher getting involved when she needn't have. He felt she was trying to trick him. This was the day after we'd had a meeting she was in and had discussed DS3 and his lack of any bond with any adults in the school.
It's all led to a 1.5 day exclusion for persistent disruptive behaviour, as he's constantly trying to get out of the classroom. Though to be fair we've pushed that, partly so we have concrete evidence they aren't coping with him, rather than writing it up as mum being fussy and anxious!
And yes I get that teachers are human, they make mistakes. But I had to ask what happened, they weren't honest about it. To me that's trying to take advantage of DS3's communication disorder, in the hope he won't tell me.
(He has ASD, diagnosed during nursery, just turned 4.)