I’m a rare species as I got it done as a teenager so I know how it feels from ‘both sides’ lol. But I had to have it done for medical reasons. So I can speak from personal authority:
Pros: It keeps it cleaner and more hygienic. Unless you own a penis and don’t like washing it? This isn’t really much of a pro.
Cons: Everything else. EVERYTHING.
Verdict: DON’T inflict it unless it’s absolutely necessary. The thought of doing that to a BABY, despite religion, is disgusting to me. I feel exactly the same as I would FGM. Horrible and disgusting practice. Some men say there is no difference but personally I have experienced both. There is a massive difference.
*have to admit though: living in the US I would be, because it’s so much the norm, and uncircumcised penises are generally considered disgusting by most women, I’d worry my theoretical son would have a terrible time as a young man if not circumcised.
I realise I am not the “target audience” for this question but it stood out to me. And this might be “off the mark” to others (female) on here, but would you think it’s the norm to consider breast enlargement for your daughter because American (or any nation) thought it looked disgusting? If I had a “terrible time” dating or sex wise from something I was born with or couldn’t help, then I wouldn’t give AF, tbh lol. (Answered as a gay man, so maybe it would be a different answer if answering as a man sexually attracted to women?) interesting question though 
