People who study the brain are all pretty clear that it only reaches full maturity at around 23 and this is used to explain a lot of things about youthful behaviour. It is why teenagers do risky things, they haven't got the capacity to fully understand it.
15 may be over the age of legal responsibility in the UK but in other countries (based on the brain thing) it is much older and I agree with that.
For everyone saying bring her back and put her on trial. What would she be charged with as we cannot safely say she will be found guilty, therefore she will be left to her own devices. What are everyone’s thoughts?
if we can't safely say she will be found guilty in a court of law why the heck are we ok with leaving her where she is? Happy to condemn her on the say so of a bunch of completely neutral other women who say she was an ISIS leader? If the failure to convict is based on human rights issues and that upsets people - i would say that we have a problem if many people think human rights should be cast aside to convict a young stupid woman.
I agree she should come back and face trial. I'm not so sure she wouldn't be found guilty, tbh. But i also think we have enough legislation in this country to arrest and confine her based on what the authorities think she may get up to, given her background.
And yes, the killers of James Bulger were children. And still they served long sentences, and one of them still is for subsequent actions.