It all sounds a bit right on, and I’m imaging the OP also being sure to hang up her rainbow flags at home this month.
I am pretty surprised that OP thought this was the norm. I’m not surprised she does it. I wouldn’t be surprised if plenty of other parents allowed it (as in: if you’re sick you are off, sick can be mental health too) but to designate 2 days and appear to have a “policy” over it? It surprises me that OP thinks that’s normal.
Do I have a policy? No.
Would I allow time off if my child wasn’t well enough for school? Of course.
Would I limit that to 2 days? No, why would I?
It’s no always appropriate to just take time off. As others have said, it can create more stress about missing work. It might also just teach a child to run away from an issue.
My cousin regularly has days off work due to her anxiety. That is appropriate. It would be ridiculous to tell her to tough it out - she’d love to, she can’t.
A child who doesn’t want to go to school may need time off. But they also may need encouragement to attend. The answer isn’t always taking time out, sometimes getting on and coping with it, is what they need to do. Giving 2 days where they have carte blanche to not attend, takes away the chance to encourage them when the SHOULD face it.
On days when that’s not appropriate - I wouldn’t limit that to 2, so there’d be no policy.
I think it’s brilliant when MH is openly talked about and not judged. Both my parents had breakdowns and long term sick as a result, so it’s quite close to my own heart. But it can go to far when children just EXPECT to experience MH issues.
My youngest watches a lot of Youtubers and at 9, is aware that they burn out, or take breaks for their MH. She would definite pick up on that and decide she needed it too. But in her case, “self care” would be self indulgent clap trap! For another child, it’s necessary.
There’s a fine line between better awareness and acceptance, and it just becoming “a thing”, which then devalues the people who actually need support.