I said OK i hit dh as hard as I can, he does same to me. He has a bruise, I am dead. Kids have lost mum. These things are not the same. Althougj we did both hit as hard as we could so from that perspective, yes. They are just as bad.
That statements indicates, that as long as the man doesnt hit hard enough to kill. It's not that bad.
Again you are dismissing the emotional and mental impact of DV.
The result of death VS a bruise, is a bit pointless. As we all know death is worse. But does that mean hitting your partner enough to bruise them isnt that bad?
I think that removing level of injury inflicted as a measure of harm, while I understand it, in getting female on male dv taken more seriously, would be detrimental to women.
No I think any abuse should be treated very strongly. Then the level of harm committed should incur further charges.
Like I said. If anyone drink drives and is caught, they will be charged with drink driving. If they hit someone and hurt them they will have further charges. If they kill someone, further charges again. But it still stands that the charge of drink driving is still there.
Anyone abusing another should be charged and dealt with as abuser. Regardless of sex. The level of damage they inflict, should incur further charges.
Many men hit their female partners, enough to bruise. Sometimes even not that hard. It's still abuse. It's not less abusive because it's not as hard as it could be.