I just don't get your logic over50
Someone thinks that blushing and giggling means that they must be a woman and therefore they now have the right to be in a womens' shelter and compete in sports against women and sleep in a shared dormitory with other women?
Why can't it just mean that they like blushing and giggling?
They all have different reasons, obviously. But so far, none of them stand up for me as a reason why they're actually a woman. It's ALL based on stereotypes of dress or behaviour. And since women all dress and act differently, how can any of it mean they are ACTUALLY women?
I am a woman because I have female chromosomes and a female reproductive system. Not because I put lipstick on sometimes or wear a dress sometimes or like flowers.
On the basis of my body, I am generally weaker than men and can get pregnant. Therefore, I need a separate space where I can not be harmed by men, raped by men or unfairly beaten in competition by men.
I'm not sure what is hard to understand or what is confusing about any of that.
I am totally pro trans rights in terms of them deserving to live happily and safely, as anyone else. I would never ask that harm comes to them. I don't give a shit if a man wants to wear make up, dresses, giggle, blush or anything else. In fact, I would love to see all gender shit just disappear. But in terms of sex, actual, biological sex, that is where we sometimes need to be separated, for women's safety.