@LaPampa “I’m def not a scientist or scientifically minded”
Very few of us are (scientists etc) on here, which is why we try to educate ourselves from up-to-date reliable sources. And of course we welcome contributions from those that are expert in this field. Risk assessments I believe are generally made by experts for various scenarios relying on several factors, and these are shown in drawing up data We rely on expert risk assessment in our own decision making.
So for example I did a risk assessment on someone recently based on my knowledge of the situation, while at the same time advising them of where to go to seek advice that would be more reassuring/conclusive to them. FWIW to my mind there was zero risk, the this was bourne out after he consulted the experts 😀
Now where the waters become a tad muddied with asking someone like Cath this sort of question is......well according to her sources measles as a virus doesn’t actually exist
so no point vaccinating (although weirdly she also does believe it exists, however she describes it, but mildly...sort of
) And then HIV is harmless so no point taking “toxic meds” it’s all rather cofusing really.
But yes, risk stats are interesting. Perhaps we trust what we know and do more regularly. Something we do more rarely - perhaps we fear more what we don’t experience or know about it so much?