It's weird posting knowing you'll get abuse but here goes.
Disbelieve me if you want but I was smacked as a child (although I could probably count on both hands the amount of times) and I can honestly say it never did me any harm.
So many people on here refer to smacking as 'hitting' or even 'violence' or 'abuse', terms which, in my opinion, are either being used to further your argument or show a misunderstanding.
My experience (as a child) and understanding (as an adult) is that smacking should be:
- VERY infrequent
- Not painful for the child
- Not done in anger or as a 'last resort'
- NEVER leave a mark
- Never be the result of a 'loss of control'
- Follow warnings
- Be explained by the parent as to the reason
The physical act of a smack is not (and certainly SHOULD not) be with the aim of inflicting any pain/harm to the child, nor should it be a form of 'punishment'.
The purpose of the physical act is so that the child knows then have crossed a line (possibly because their behaviour is potentially dangerous or harmful to themselves or others). A light smack on the bottom (again, not leaving marks or inflicting pain) engages the child's brain and makes them more aware of your words/explanation.
If you choose not to smack your child then that's fine and I fully respect your choice. If you choose to smack your child in the way described above then I think the abuse you will (as I inevitably will) receive on this thread is unjustified and, to be honest, a little 'holier than thou'.
IF, HOWEVER, you regularly 'smack' your child, inflict physical pain on them, do it out of frustration or anger, leave a mark or accompany it with aggression (or aggressive language), basically, if your form of discipline/punishment could, even remotely, be described as 'violence' then, yes, you are indeed scum.