@Notmyrealname85
That really does sound negative.
I don't think the age of the father should be the prime consideration simply because it may mean his child has to be his carer.
To be blunt, if someone needs a huge amount of care, they have to go into a care home- there comes a point where family cannot cope.
More of an issue is location. Many of my friends who live away from elderly parents are not able to care for them so the dilemma is which care home.
There is no RIGHT age to be the carer for a parent (and there are 12 year olds who are caring for young parents, don't forget.)
It's hard if you are still a child, if you have young children, or are still in your 20s.
It's hard if you are in your 50s or 60s when you might be struggling with your own midlife issues - teenage children, children going through university, coming back home to live, trying to find work, and then helping to look after grandchildren AND you don't have as much energy as a younger person.
But let's get real: someone who is a father at 45, is unlikely to be in poor health at 65 or 70 IF they look after their health (and 70% of chronic illness in later life is due to lifestyle.)
No parent has a RIGHT to be cared for by their child.
I don't know any of my friends- and we have parents in their 80s and 90s- who are their carer.
Those parents who became too ill to be cared for at home (with social services carers and community nursing) are now in care homes.
Those who need a bit of help, ask their children to taxi them to appts, do their shopping, etc. I don't actually know anyone who is a full time carer - but many of us are juggling our own work, children, relationships etc with trying to see our elderly parents when we can (often VERY long distance.)