I remember seeing them in London in the 80s when I was quite a little girl, (6/7) when they were exclusively worn by tourists or temporary residents (for example diplomatic staff), they were only ever seen in tourist spots, ones particularly for the rich especially so. Bond Street, British Museum and Kensington were particular hot spots. It was a particular type called a yashmak which was a face covering showing only the eyes which led directly into a flowing robe. Always black. Only ever seen on women from a few Arab gulf states, mainly Saudis. Never Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Iraqi or Iranian or Afghani women which were or had recently been a bit more progressive in those days. It was understood that they were forced to wear it by a highly patriarchal society which forced them to wear it.
Never saw a face covering outside London until the 00s. and don’t believe I saw what I thought was a permanent London resident until about the same time. They do and they don’t bother me at the same time. I went to Uni in the early 00s when the hijab was becoming popular. I know Muslim friends who chose to adopt it out of free choice. Partly because there was a trend towards more conservative Islam including among the young, but because this was around the time of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and frequently their Islam was becoming more political and they were identifying more with the places and cultures their families originally came from. Those women were often involved with very mainstream political action like ‘Stop the War’ and it was a genuine thoughtful decision often motivated by a genuine desire to wear an outward expression of their religion.
I’m still friends with some of these women and have spoken to them about full face coverings (which none of them wear). I understand in some UK communities (Bangladeshi and some Arab in particular) it is still not a free choice for women to wear it. Increasingly though it seems like young women, in particular young Pakistani women, are wearing it through their own free choice because they follow, and want to signal they follow, an ultra Conservative form of Islam which is anti-integration and often not compatible with British values.
That does worry me, but I’m against ‘banning the burka’ because I think singling out religious groups or women is dangerous. But if a genuine security issue arose and it could be proven allowing face coverings facilitated terror or crime then I’d support a ban on face covering in public but that would include using scarves (football hooligans and EDL do this) to obscure the bottom of your face, balaclavas and motorcycle helmets off the bike, it wouldn’t just be ‘ban the burka’.