I don’t think I’m unreasonable to suggest that health advice to men would not be based on theory, but we will never know beacause men will never have babies.
Too true. But that’s because you know, men can handle scientific fact. Women need it SHOUTED AT THEM, repeatedly in layman’s terms. If you don’t dumb it down and yell it in our faces, we just don’t get it.
I was just reading about a campaign in quebec which was halted. It said “one drink could hurt your foetus”. Cue loads of women freaking out and asking for abortions for their completely healthy babies because they’d had a glass of wine! They pulled the campaign.
As I’ve said a few times on here, it’s about balance, and I think the way some of these messages are disseminated is wrong imo, (and possibly more about arse covering than science). Placing the blame on the mother for all possible future problems with dc is lazy and suits the patriarchy down to the ground. The Australian article saying a child becoming aggressive between the ages two and fifteen years old is down to moderate drinking in pregnancy? I mean, on the face of it, that seems seriously shaky ‘evidence’ does it not? If there’s more to it, and I’m sure there is, they really need to share the full picture. I hate the way things are oversimplified for pregnant mothers. As I’ve said, this is just the beginning. After the birth it’s ‘breast is best, breast is best, breast is best, breast is best’.
And I say this as a very wary pregnant person, (when pregnant), a very wary alcohol drinker, (due to family history with alcohol), and a doggedly determined breastfeeder!