On the tiger....
When women point out transwomen (as a group) are a threat to women (as a group) we're saying it's in the same way as men are. I'm NOT saying transwomen are a particular threat, but that men are a known threat and no one has proved that transwomen stop committing crime like men when they become women...
But then, we're accused of calling all transwomen predators, or we're told everyone can be a threat, it's nonsense to be threatened by transwomen, or we get Paris Lees saying it's a fear we must get over, like phobia of escalators for example or we're told there's no evidence that transwomen are a threat to women.
But we know tigers are a threat to humans. We know not every tiger will attack us at every moment, many will leave humans alone. but even so, we know it's in the nature of some of them. Enough for us to not trust them at all, anywhere near us!
Men are thankfully not as dangerous as tigers! They do come near us! We just don't want them places we're vulnerable, if we don't know and trust them. We do know that, as a group, they contain some men who mean harm to women and girls. Enough of them that 1 in 5 UK women have sustained sexual violence since the sage of 16. The figure is much higher if you include sexual violence to women when underage.
Men are a threat.
To say transwomen aren't a threat is nonsense! Firstly, there's lots of evidence of transwomen committing sexual crimes. Secondly no one has proved they lose male pattern violence just because they think they're women.
We're not singling out transwomen. We're just saying, we can see this is a tiger. No amount of telling us they identify as a gazelle is going to put our minds at rest. We know it's a fucking tiger. We can see it with out own eyes, and you may have done mental gymnastics to decide it's a gazelle, but we'd rather not be attacked because of your belief system, thanks.