Queen I’m getting confused by your posts re the mother- the SCR detailed her neglecting the children and SS involvement was primarily around her leaving them In the care of unsuitable people and continuing to do so after SS told her not to. I do understand what you’re getting at- that she didn’t rape and kill her baby - but I don’t think anyone is saying she did
No, nobody is saying that she raped her baby. But, as rose has helpfully demonstrated, a lot of people are casting around to find some way she is at fault, with the feeling that "she must of [sic] done something". And they're attributing to her things which are not true (such as that she had four children taken into care) but that people feel SHOULD have been true.
Would I leave my kids with her? No. Did she make mistakes as a mother? Undoubtedly. What's the point of picking over them now, when they had nothing to do with Poppi's death? Paul Worthington was never a focus of Social Services interest or a source of concern to them. I find it distasteful, misogynistic and a little cruel for people to be so determined to find a way she is at fault. If anything, as a woman coming out of the care system, born to a woman who came out of the care system, she succeeded as a mother in the face of having huge disadvantages from birth.
If Paul Worthington is guilty, whoever else SS were concerned about her leaving her kids with is irrelevant. If it's relevant, Paul Worthington quite possibly isn't guilty. You can't have it both ways.