to be shocked by these dresses on the red carpet?

[Iris65]

Am I getting old or are these dresses completely outrageous? I am staggered that women would wear this style of dress. Men don’t dress with their scrotums on show!

theeditorsjournal.wordpress.com/2016/09/08/crotch-gate/

I noticed a link to several celebrities wearing similarly hideous dresses this morning. I would never wear something that hideous around the house, let alone in public! This will be remembered as a really bad fashion decade for these dresses alone!

Oh yes hygene reasons bleurgh. They are dehydrated for dress purposes there is no peeing

Good god. The least the woman in orange could have done was fake tan down there.

Aren't all these excesses reminiscent of the Roman Empire? We even have the oddly incestous comments from the US emperor.

Liz Hurley wore a dress like this to Henry PoshyPoshy's wedding. You could see her leopard print knickers.

Not shocked but just threw up a little in my mouth. Quite frankly they would have looked less trashy naked

swap celebrities for models, this isn't the link but the pink dress is even worse!
www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/most-embarrassing-red-carpet-dresses-8766120

Liz Hurley knickers

I read once that porn stars painted on tan lines to make them look ‘cheaper’ and draw attention to the relevant areas (although one would think if someone was watching porn they wouldn’t need an eye catching flangina to get their attention! ‘Oh is that the place I’m meant to be concentrating on?’). Maybe it’s something like that?

Anyway. Us peng ting types wear frocks like that to Lidl. Laterz Haterz.

I think the operative word there is “knickers” VanillaSugar.

None of these ladies have put their pants on.

You can see flappage in the pink dress

It's hideous, I also hate dresses that normal folk wear that shows below the cleavage, Amanda Holden loves this particular style.

OMFG

They are horrific! They remind me of those really high leg leotards from the eighties, but they were worn over shorts/leggings.

Those women genuinely look a bit demented to me, as if they have left the house without remembering to put anything on their bottom half.

Seen these before and I'm sorry to inform you all but they have most definitely become a thing, this style filtered down to Towie and other z listers.

isn't it sad that it's the only thing they found to get a bit of attention?
They are far from ugly,

Well, we do have a Duchess who is famous for wearing the floattiest dresses on public occasions, and whose bum has been photographed on many public occasions and shown around the world. What do I know.

At least Liz had the decency to put her scants on!

Is it "sad" to use your body to get attention... when you're a professional model?? Anyway I think for a lot of people - men AND women - it's part and parcel of being young, regardless of whether or not it's in your job description.

Ok I haven't read RTHT but who are they? I bet they are not well known which is why they're out looking like that.

A Who is always desperate for attention and they got it, so well done them?

Crikey how long did you have to look before you found those pics from over a year ago

There is one word for those dresses: FUGLY!!!

They're not "sad" and it's not the only way of getting attention but it certainly is very easy if you've got the body for it and are happy to show it.

It is interesting that there really aren't men turning up to things like this wearing very little. They might wear an unconventional outfit, but not one that is flesh-baring.

Gross attention seeking tbh. It also reinforces the view, in some people's minds, that women are just there for men's titillation. Not for their minds, acting abilities or any other abilities. Just for their sexually available bodies. No wonder the likes of Weinstein think all women are game

I think that's got more to do with how women and men respond differently to bare flesh on the opposite sex, but that's just my theory. Also, the men have the attention by default in a professional sense I reckon.