Like when people have subjects like "to not allow boys in the girl's changing room" - it's intentionally goady. Why not just put say "to not allow transexuals in the girl's changing room" - it's perfectly clear then and it's a more nuanced debate.
No, it is not goady, it is factually correct.
If you write "transsexuals" no one will know whether female or male transsexuals are meant, and most people are going to assume it is about female transsexuals in the girl's changing room, because clearly, only female-sexed people have any business being there.
Most people who have never heard of it before assume that "transwoman" = female. That's normal use of language - women are female, a female adult is a woman.
You want to obscure the facts.
I refuse to do that. A male is a male is a male. And 13 year old human female is a girl. Regardless of what kind of thoughts she has in her head.
You wouldn't insist on people writing "13 year old who considers herself terribly ugly has rhinoplasty" to enable people to justify it to themselves before even reading the thread, would you?
So why would one have to mention what sort of thoughts the 13 year old in question has when they are about transgenderism?