There is a distinction between pointing out that something comes from a history of women being chattel, which this tradition unquestionably does, and saying it is wrong. You need to not conflate the two, which is what you're doing here. Nor have I said anything to suggest people have made a particular decision because they're conditioned either. That's a strawman I won't be responsible for.
Straw man? You quoted what I said I responded. The post you quoted clearly talks about people being derogatory about women who choose to take their husbands name. You quoted it.
And lastly, people have every right to comment on decisions other people make, particularly when they affect them. Which other women's decisions to change their names on marriage and use the title 'Mrs' do me, because they make my desire to have a neutral choice, in the way men get, less of a possibility. Being women, we don't get to pick names and titles that don't have any impact on other women, and your desire to have a title reflecting your married status also relies on other people using titles that reinforce this (ie Mrs would soon stop having any connotation of a married woman if unmarried women adopted it en masse). You do not have the right to squash discussion of this because you don't like it.
At no point have I tried to squash any discussion. Again you quoted me talking about people who are derogatory about people's choices. An no you don't have a right to force you opinion on people who have made a choice for themselves purely because you want a neutral choice.
Regardless of you wants you don't not have the right to impose your opinion on anyone. That is anti feminism. Telling women what they should do because you want something a particular way is a huge step in the wrong direction.