There seems to be a tendency on MN to name a child a bully in reception My dd has been hit with fists, had mud throw at her, pulled to the ground, had her lunch thrown on the floor, had a pencil scratched down her arm, hit on the head with fists & a book, been bitten, pushed over, pushed around (all multiple times)...by a 5/6yr old who was a reception pupil. Almost every day FOR A YEAR we would have "X did Y to me" But that isn't a bully, no? I beg to differ.
Oh & get this....my dd was told by her teacher that it wasn't my daughter's job to tell ME what X had done to her, because it would hurt X's feelings if she overheard it. Oh but it's ok now for me to have a battle EVERY morning to get my dd to go to school. Needless to say that I encouraged my daughter to tell me what she needed to tell me, every time she needed to tell me. Silence the victim? No thank you!
Nice bit of victim blaming Maryz. I'm disgusted with your attitude on this. As am I.
but you really are deliberately misconstruing and misquoting every thing I said I disagree. I have read your posts how outy has read them...perhaps you need to look at what you are saying and how, if some many people are "misconstruing and misquoting" what you say.
This sentence
But if your dd was to have a party and invite the entire year bar this one child, do you think that would make things between them better
I have a real issue with. To me, it reads like victim blaming. Again, I have to agree with Outy.
They're talking about young children being spiteful and vindictive, So we can exclude for out & out violence, but not spitefulness & vindictiveness? A lot of what my daughter experienced was vindictive, and I maintain that that child would not be welcome in my home. People seem to be downplaying just how fucking harmful spiteful & vindictive behaviour is. The girl who bullied outy's dd was not given the message that the bullying was unacceptable, and she ramped it, turning it into criminal behaviour.
There, most "bullying" (insofar as a 4 year old, or even an 8 year old can be considered to be a deliberate bully) is over-activity, low-level violence or disruption Why is bullying in inverted commas? Do you believe that primary school children are incapable of bullying? And "low level violence" ok as a "bullying" technique? And please explain, what the hell "over activity" is? Is that being shoved/pulled to the ground/having a pencil scrapped over your skin (and breaking the skin), being bitten, having your lunch thrown on the floor?
You are minimising bullying. Lots of people have shared as to how bullying in primary school has affected themselves/their child, me included & you are minimising what they have been through. So no, perhaps not victim blaming, but minimising, definitely yes! Because now you seem to be saying that only cases of extreme violence in any setting other than primary school would be counted as bullying.
Nice.