What happens if the excluded one isn't? The one that's maybe not as fun, or socially awkward, or just not your cup if tea? But not hurtful, or mean?
I've said that's unacceptable. And I'd be very very disappointed in my child and if they thought it was acceptable to exclude someone on the basis of them being different I'd reconsider having a party at all.
The replies are all that it's not ok to not invite only one child.
I don't think they are. Some are saying they should be invited.
There's a difference between a bit of hitting/shoving/"you're not my friend" at that age of 6 and serious physical harm at the age of 15. And lots in between
Yes there is lots of inbetween. My bullying was when I was at primary school and started in reception. If I hadn't have gone through it I would never, ever believe kids could be so vicious even at such a very young age. The first time I got my food spat in was when I and they, were 6. That's the age when I also had my face pushed in mud by two kids and I passed out. And they told me they were going to go to my dads grave and shit on it. It peaked at 8/9. I've projected a whoooole lot on this thread but I wanted to explain what it can be like even when kids are very young because a lot of people don't believe it can get that bad, and that it's all he said she said, i'm not your friend, calling names business when it can be much more.
Isolating a child who is currently not being very nice won't teach them to be nice; it'll teach them that it's ok to be not nice
You see it as isolating which is fair enough, I see it as safe guarding. I'm still not sure why I should exclude other friends who have done nothing wrong.
On the whole though I don't get why people do these massive parties anyway. I'm arguing the toss here but I don't even think this situation will ever arise coz I won't be allowing full class parties full stop, sod that for a game of soldiers.