Sorry OP but I have to take issue with Phalenopsisgirl on this:
If she is in essence male then she will already be male, she will have been male since early pregnancy it's just when the chemical released to give her a male body were released something caused a block and she got girl bits.
This is transgender cult speak and betrays a truly strartling ignorance of biology.
She has girl bits because she (almost certainly) has XX chromosomes, nothing to do with chemicals being blocked. There is a condition called Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome where an individual has XY chromosomes but doesn't respond to the male hormones and develops as a female, but people in this (very rare) case mostly still identify as female and do not think of themselves as "in essence male".
I recently read about someone in this situation who is now the mother of twins, as her doctors found she had a nascent womb inside her which they managed to develop with hormones to the point of her being able to carry a pregnancy to term.
The chances of OP's DD having this syndrome are very, very slight and even if she had it it would not make her "in essence male" - what does that even mean? Is there a male or a female essence that isn't tied to the physical body? Isn't male or female just about biology, about your reproductive capacity?
As far as I'm aware there is absolutely no properly tested, rigorous scientific evidence that there is such a thing as a male brain or a female brain. In nature there is just different biology; society encourages different socialisation for girls and boys but this idea that gender is inherent and independent of biological sex is a very, very dangerous one; and the existence of a tiny number of intersex people has nothing to do with the current insistence that (non intersex) transgender people actually are the sex they want to identify with.
All those quoting stories of wanting to be boys as little girls - the amount of pressure that would be put on you or your friends nowadays to identity as transgender is truly frightening, and amounts to child abuse in my book, in terms of forcing children to make a choice they don't have the maturity to understand - especially as we don't yet know the long term effects of the puberty blockers some of them are being encouraged to take.