In the latest wave of violence, the current death toll stands at 7 Israelis (my source for this is the New York Times) and "over 30" Palestinians.
Can anyone honestly say this suggests a fair or proportionate response?
Is anyone okay with the recent instructions to the IDF to use live ammunition on protesters? They're basically experiencing Bloody Sunday every day, to put that in context.
I have never condoned any individual attacks on civilians. I find them all horrendous. To look to understand the context of an action is not the same as condoning it. This violence is not happening in a vacuum. It's happening in the face of an occupation. Gaza remains rubble. The West Bank has to endure checkpoints, night-time raids, violence from settlers, violence from the IDF, and constant death, even when things are supposedly stable. The IDF kill a couple of youths a month. It never makes the BBC. It's not considered newsworthy at all.
Unfortunately for the Palestinians, they either have to die in quite large numbers (preferably with lots of dead kids), or kill an Israeli, in order to get the world media's attention.
I disagree particularly strongly with the assertion that Israel is small and vulnerable. It's heavily armed with the latest and best military technology, and it has a very wealthy and generous patron in the form of the US.
They managed to flatten Gaza without breaking a sweat whilst Hamas' best efforts were easily intercepted by their Iron Dome.
I'm also a bit bemused at the argument that borders change all the time so that's okay. Most of the changes to borders in Europe have been the consequence of war, with large-scale death and displacement. It's a painful process. The constant "shifting" of the Israeli border equally has consequences to those on the receiving end, already living there. Conflict, death and refugees. So it's pretty wrong to talk lightly about borders shifting as if it were no big deal.
Horriblemotherco why do you put occupation in quotation marks? How would you describe what is happening?