DC has called for better integration, which can only lead to less, not more
Wrong. DC was calling for less tolerance, restrictions on thought and speech. Restrictions on movement and action. A reduction in the rights of a selected group of individuals based on racial profiling. If history tells us nothing else, it us that singling out a group of people and removing their rights and freedoms, eventually removes everyone's rights and freedoms.
I believe everyone has a right to believe and talk about what they wish. If someone hates me, they have an absolute right to do so, and an absolute right to tell others about it. They can scream it from the rooftops. And likewise, I, them. No common law is broken until he harms me, or I harm him.
I'm fairly neutral on the idea of dropping bombs on ISIS. The only thing that sways me against is the likelihood that some of those bombs will hit the wrong target.
You believe you (your country acting on your behalf) have the right to bomb someone who poses no threat to you, can pose no threat to you, indeed lives half way around the planet from where you live. And you believe you should have the right to bomb them. You do not know personally that ANY of what little information you have been fed by your newspaper and your television is true. You do not know with any certainty that the people you choose to kill have done wrong. But you would reserve yourself the right to judge them based on that information and carry out summery execution?
At the very least, if you believe we should kill others because of what they do in a country on the other side of the planet, and your only reservation is collateral damage, them have DP sign up for military service and go and do it personally. That way you can be sure he is doing the right thing, and mistakes are not happening.
Or is it easier just to have people killed because it doesn't affect you and your family? I don't understand the morals here.