There isn't much difference. They are both provocative and hostile acts, and both calculated to elicit shock and a response.
The only difference is that an aggressive woman might behave as ZipZilla did in order to antagonise a perceived rival. An aggressive man might feel free to go as far as the one in that bar in Crete, especially when in the company of like-minded aggressors.
I do not think the assault that evening was aimed at me. I was just the conduit. I didn't matter. They wanted to do something to humiliate DH who couldn't protect 'his woman' or better, provoke a ruck which would lead to him bleeding on the pavement.
The upshot is that we both felt like shit and they'd ruined our lovely evening.
And do not try and make something of me being a little woman. I was furious. He said: 'please, please leave it. I love you. But they're going to kill me.'
So I did. Because they would have.
That is what some people do. They are aggressive and seething with inadequacy. They neither care nor think about the consequences of their actions. It's all about them.
badbaldingballerina123 gets it. Another poster much earlier in this thread said that if someone behaved like ZipZilla she could expect a glassing.
No, I'd never do that. I'd back down every time but I don't apologise for feeling very angry at the fact that to keep the peace and keep out of A&E I've had to be the bigger person.
You are truly blessed if you've never come across that kind of nutter.
They are trouble.