When my beautiful and perfect daughter in my eyes, of course died at 6 weeks old, the last thing we could do in her honour was donate her organs.
Despite her loss, several other babies lived.
The baby in question here was loved dearly by its parents. They made the decision to donate the organs. This was not done without consent newborn babies, even ones that are neurologically intact, are not capable of informed consent. You are simple minded to think otherwise.
How utterly foul of you to dare suggest she was "carved up for parts". I sincerely hope you never have a child waiting for a heart, lungs or a liver, transplants without which, the patient WILL die. Frankly, if you do, I hope you reconsider this selfish and simple minded stance. If you do not, then you will have to refuse any organ offered to you, as its original owner will not have been in a state to consent.
Frankly, to be honest, I hope you personally ARE in a situation where you require an organ - and suffer horrendously as a result. The donor, after all, won't be able to personally provide consent.
Because, frankly, organ donation does not lie in the decisions of the donor, but in the kindness and selflessness of the next of kin, during what is, without a doubt, likely the most difficult time of their lives.
I guess you don't consent on behalf of your child requiring surgical intervention, either? Vaccinations? Regular medical care?