the pin art wasn't taken as a momento, it was purely a coincidence
That's irrelevant, it was being USED as a memento!
Would you take a plasticine model and roll it into a ball? Or break up a Lego creation and make your own? Same thing to me Exactly!
Also unlike Lego they're wrecked pretty much the moment you touch them Which is why it has probably sat pretty much where the little girl left it, in order to preserve its' state, which is why they weren't able to put it up anywhere else.
I am pretty sure that they have had more then the op visit in the last year, yet only the op managed to wreck the memento.
EddieStobbart That isn't how I interpret events, it is ops attitude of me me me & blaming the grieving family for daring to have something sentimental on display & not under a lock & key. I have been to plenty of homes, friends, friends of friends, relatives of friends, but have never felt the need to pick up anything in order to interact with people in the room. I may have pointed something out & remarked.
Even with these things, yes, they are essentially toys, but they hold an image, and I would ask before I carelessly picked it up, in case that image was something that a person wanted to look at for a while.
Why the debate as to who invited her/whether she was invited? It doesn't make what happened any less upsetting for the family.
I am baffled by all these "you were being nosy and shouldn't touch things in other people's houses" responses.... What do you do when you visit someone? Ask stiltedly "may I touch this chair? May I step on your carpet?
Bit of a crap comparison really, isn't it? Unless you are comparing a memento of the families deceased child with a chair. If I invite someone into my house, it is obvious that they are likely to sit on my chairs, walk on my carpet, less obvious that they are going to feel the need to touch & move my photos, or fiddle with my dhs display of his deceased grandfathers' war medals. Something are bound to be used by people visiting your home.