It is absolutely untrue that everyone would be saying any one same thing.
If a woman was on here saying that she couldn't understand why her partner didn't lie about his number when asked directly for his number, that he should have lied because the truth was shameful, I'd say exactly the same thing as I have said on this thread and I bet a load of others would too.
Some would probably have done the whole ltb thing
And others would come along to explain exactly why it's ok, no, better for a man to have 'sown his wild oats' and that it's not actually a negative thing.
Why the hell should someone have to lie. That's what I'd still be asking. Regardless of gender, that's the key question.
Choose to disclose, choose not to, that's down to the individual. I think it's childish to be playing such silly 'truth' games but my problem is with the suggestion that the person ought to have lied.
You ought to lie about this because the truth of it is revolting.
That's the top and bottom of attitude behind the belief that a lie should have been told and it's a bloody horrible attitude to have about your partner, regardless their gender or yours.
Apart from anything else, this is a man here who started this thread and stated that he was disappointed because he had thought that everyone would be expressing shock and anger, who confirmed that his partner is indeed a member of mumsnet, who when it was said that yes, she'd likely see this thread, said "whoops" and said "yes she may see the thread and so what?"
I think we can take from that that it makes sense that he had a different agenda by posting this here than simply wanting to discuss issues of rl privacy choices made by his partner and the implications for his standing in their 'little town'.