I have no personal problem in principle if someone wants to provide a service for money. I don't think it's a sexual act when a dancer does the dancing, but an erotic act. That would separate the intentions of the dancer, not the watcher.
However, I would go spare if my partner was to go to a strip club. For many of the reasons Sugar has mentioned, namely some pretty dodgy people there. Besides, he decided to be with me not someone else and why if he is with me, would he want to be having feelings of an erotic nature about another woman. To me, that would mean I am not satisfying enough and that would be a big problem in our relationship.
I'd also have no respect for him if he got pressured into doing it. If he does get pressured to go in say on his stag do and he doesn't say no and implicitly doesn't go, I wont be going ahead with the wedding. At least, not then. He's a fully grown man and can say no quite easily enough. I really can't see him doing this, but just using it as an example.
I don't actually feel offended by what Sugar has said perse. Many woman use words like 'whore/tart/slut' to describe someone who tried it on with their friends partner, say. So is it not misgynistic(sp) to use it in that context too then, because it's a word that men normally use?
I do think it's best to just ignore those who antagonise though and not bite to it.
I think if you choose to do that line of work you are leaving yourself open to be judged, rightly or wrongly.
I don't see it as empowering for anyone except the owners of these establishments.
The dancers think their empowered but have to give some money to the owners/bosses and ultimately do get told what to do.
The punters think their empowered/in control because they are paying for services but if there was no money there they would mean nothing, which makes them pretty useless plus their money (quite a lot, usually) gets taken by the girls and the owners.
So only really the owners win in any account.
But back to the original post - if you told him explicitly that you would not stand for it, then you have good reason to be incredibly pissed and I personally don't know if I could move on from it. It's hard to know unless it's happened to you. But am I the only one who thinks that getting a bag for yourself on his money is a tit for tat and actually is just as bad, if not worse, because it's actually stealing? Not to say he wasn't a complete bastard but it's like someone cheating and then you cheating back, nobody wins and everyone ends up being a twat.
I hope you're OK OP.